
PSG Crowned Champions After Final Penalty Shootout
The 2025/26 UCL Fantasy season is complete: PSG beat Arsenal in the final on penalties. This article now works as a post-season read on the fantasy calls that mattered around the final.
The first version of this preview leaned too heavily into Paris, because the raw top-end numbers are loud. Khvicha Kvaratskhelia has 117 points, 10 goals and 6 assists. Vitinha has 94 points, 1,439 minutes and 77 recoveries. Willian Pacho and Nuno Mendes both sit above 85 points. That matters.
But Arsenal are not just the opponent in this final. They are the other side of the fantasy decision. David Raya has 71 points and 9 clean sheets. Gabriel has 75 points, 8 clean sheets and attacking/set-piece threat. William Saliba has 63 points and 55 recoveries. Gabriel Martinelli, Bukayo Saka and Viktor Gyökeres all give Arsenal credible routes to the goal that flips the final.
The final at a glance
- PSG ceilingKvaratskhelia, Doué, Dembélé, Hakimi
- PSG floorVitinha, Pacho, Nuno Mendes
- Arsenal floorRaya, Gabriel, Saliba, Rice
- Arsenal upsideMartinelli, Saka, Gyökeres, Trossard
PSG have the bigger ceiling, but Arsenal may have the cleaner floor
The best way to read this final is ceiling versus structure. PSG have more players who can create a fantasy return from one moment. Kvaratskhelia can beat a man and finish. Dembélé can turn limited minutes into a goal. Doué has already produced 71 points in 754 minutes, which is exactly the kind of efficiency that can matter in a one-off game.
Arsenal's case is different. Their fantasy strength is not one runaway scorer. It is control, defensive reliability and enough wide threat to punish PSG if the game tilts. Raya's 9 clean sheets are not an accident. Gabriel and Saliba both combine minutes, clean-sheet potential and recovery routes. Rice and Zubimendi are less glamorous, but their roles can survive a tense final better than a pure punt attacker.
The captaincy debate is closer than it looks
Kvaratskhelia is still the headline captain. He has the best attacking total in the match, the strongest blend of goals and assists, and he is a midfielder rather than a forward. If you want the highest ceiling captain, he is the obvious starting point.
But Arsenal give you real alternatives depending on how you think the match plays. Martinelli has 69 points, 6 goals and 2 assists from only 663 minutes. That is a punchy output profile, not filler. Saka has a lower total at 43 points, but his role, set-piece involvement and big-match route to returns keep him live. Gyökeres is the more direct chaos play: 5 goals, 2 assists and a forward's chance of deciding the match in one action.
Arsenal defence deserves serious respect
This is the part most managers will underrate because PSG's attacking names are shinier. Arsenal defenders are not just clean-sheet lottery tickets. Gabriel has 75 points, 8 clean sheets, 55 recoveries, plus a goal and assist. That is an elite final profile because he can score in multiple ways: clean sheet, recoveries, set pieces and minutes.
Raya is just as important. A goalkeeper with 9 clean sheets, high ownership and a stable role is exactly the sort of pick that can quietly beat a fashionable attacker if the final tightens. Saliba is the slightly cheaper/steadier route with 63 points, 7 clean sheets and 55 recoveries. If you think Arsenal can keep this close, one Arsenal defensive pick is not cautious — it is sensible.
Best Arsenal routes
- Raya71 pts, 9 clean sheets
- Gabriel75 pts, 8 clean sheets, set-piece threat
- Saliba63 pts, 55 recoveries
- Rice55 pts, 36 recoveries, safer midfield role
- Martinelli69 pts, 6 goals, 2 assists
PSG defence is still where the data screams value
That does not mean abandoning PSG defenders. Pacho remains one of the best floor picks in the final: 88 points, 101 recoveries and near-perfect minutes. Nuno Mendes is the more exciting hybrid with 85 points, 2 goals, 2 assists and 83 recoveries. Hakimi is riskier because of the flag, but 6 assists from defence is still the clearest attacking-defender ceiling on the board.
The decision is not PSG defence versus Arsenal defence. It is what kind of final you expect. If PSG dominate territory, Pacho and Nuno are magnificent. If Arsenal turn it into a controlled, lower-event game, Gabriel, Saliba and Raya become very attractive.
The midfield choice is where the final gets won
Most builds will naturally drift towards PSG midfield because Kvaratskhelia and Vitinha are so strong. That is fine. But Arsenal midfield should not be dismissed. Martinelli has better goal output than most final midfielders. Saka has the role and set-piece path. Rice is a lower-ceiling but higher-stability pick who can collect minutes, recoveries and clean-sheet points if Arsenal control phases.
The trap is picking only from the team you think will win. In a final, the winning team does not automatically contain every best fantasy pick. A 1-1 or 2-1 game can easily produce points on both sides, especially with midfielders and defenders who have more than one route to score.
How I would build the final squad now
My balanced build starts with Kvaratskhelia, Vitinha and one PSG defender from Pacho or Nuno Mendes. Then I want at least one Arsenal defensive piece, most likely Gabriel or Raya. After that, the aggressive slot is where you choose your story: Martinelli if you believe Arsenal can hurt PSG wide, Saka if you trust role and set pieces, Doué or Dembélé if you want PSG chaos.
Priority board for the final
- Best captainKvaratskhelia
- Best Arsenal captain puntMartinelli
- Best safe premiumVitinha
- Best Arsenal defensive pickGabriel or Raya
- Best PSG defensive pickPacho or Nuno Mendes
- Best aggressive differentialDoué, Dembélé or Saka
Post-final verdict
PSG ended the 2025/26 season as champions, beating Arsenal on penalties after the final stayed tight enough for every floor-versus-ceiling argument to matter. The big lesson from a UCL Fantasy point of view is simple: finals reward ceiling, but they punish one-team thinking.
For the archive, the sharp pre-final build was not to blindly stack Paris. It was to use PSG for ceiling, Arsenal for floor, and then choose one brave attacking opinion. PSG ultimately delivered the trophy, but the decision framework still holds for future one-off finals.
















